← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT05698446 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study

Condition: Ankle Sprains · Hypermobility Syndrome  ·  Sponsor: Peking University Third Hospital

PhaseN/A
Planned participants114
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Dong Jiang, MD  ·  13811280948  ·  bysyjiangdong@126.com

Anhong Wang, MD  ·  18501325799  ·  1811210533@pku.edu.cn

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Peking University Third HospitalBeijing, ChinaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05698446