← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT05658289 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Latarjet vs Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction

Condition: Shoulder Dislocation · Bone Loss · Arthroscopy  ·  Sponsor: Nova Scotia Health Authority

PhaseNA
Planned participants68
Who can joinAll sexes, 16 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteersYes

About this study

Anterior shoulder dislocations occur when the humeral head translates anterior to the glenoid cause pain, stiffness, and glenoid bone loss. If left untreated, the risk of recurrence can be up to or greater than 90%. The only surgically modifiable factor to reduce the risk of recurrence is the glenoid bone loss (GBL), where surgeons have the ability to recreate the shape of the glenoid and reduce the risk of recurrent shoulder dislocations. Established boney procedures for shoulder instability include the Latarjet and free bone block procedures, such as the Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction (AGR). The Latarjet is well known for its lower rate of recurrent instability, but raises concerns due to under-appreciated complications rates. The AGR is a newer surgical approach that has garnered attention for its low rate of recurrent instability and complication profile. Both treatments can reduce pain, increase function following surgery and reduce the risk of recurrent instability. However, these two established approaches have yet to be directly compared and studied on a larger scale. The purpose of this randomized control trial is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes pre- and post-operatively between the Latarjet to the AGR.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Ivan Wong, MD  ·  9024737626  ·  research@drivanwong.com

Sarah Remedios, MSc  ·  9024737626  ·  research@drivanwong.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Nova Scotia Health QEII Halifax InfirmaryHalifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05658289