Condition: Technology · Comparison · Sponsor: Exactech
The primary objective of this study is to examine the optimization of Reverse Shouder Arthroplasty implant position between GPS and conventional techniques. The secondary objective is to assess the effect of implant position using GPS vs. conventional techniques on ROM and patient reported outcomes. Long-term follow-up to 10 years with minimum 2 year follow-up for patients.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Rachael Craig · 352-377-1140 · rachael.craig@exac.com
Sandrine Angibaud · 352-377-1140 · sandrine.angibaud@exac.com
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Dijklander Ziekenhuis | Hoorn, Netherlands | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05615259