Condition: Incisional Hernia · Sponsor: Clayton Petro
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the difference in quality of life at one year postoperatively for patients undergoing incisional hernia repair with mesh versus suture repair using modern techniques. The main question it aims to answer are: • Determine if primary suture repair is non-inferior to mesh repair for incisional hernias 2-6cm with respect to quality of life using the HerQLes summary score at one year postoperatively.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Clayton Petro, MD · 2169242930 · petroc@ccf.org
William Bennett, MD · 2163138971 · bennetw2@ccf.org
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| University of Florida | Gainesville, Florida, United States | Recruiting |
| Northwestern | Chicago, Illinois, United States | Recruiting |
| Cleveland Clinic Main Campus | Cleveland, Ohio, United States | Recruiting |
| The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center | Columbus, Ohio, United States | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Vanderbilt University | Nashville, Tennessee, United States | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05599750