Condition: Multiple Sclerosis · Sponsor: University Hospital, Bordeaux
The aim of this study is to compare the 3D OPTIMIZED MPRAGE WMN sequence to "conventional sequences" used in spinal cord analysis. The patients will be explored at the cervical level with the conventional 2D sagittal T2 FSE, 2D sagittal STIR, 2D sagittal PSIR, 3D T1 MPRAGE sequences, and the sequence of interest 3D sagittal OPTIMIZED WMN MPRAGE and 3D axial OPTIMIZED WMN MPRAGE. At the thoracic level, with the conventional 2D sagittal T2 FSE, 2D sagittal STIR, 3D T1 MPRAGE sequences and the sequence of interest 3D sagittal OPTIMIZED WMN MPRAGE.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Vincent Dousset, MD, PhD · +335 56 79 56 04 · vincent.dousset@chu-bordeaux.fr
Amaury Ravache, MD · amaury.ravache@chu-bordeaux.fr
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| CHU de Bordeaux | Bordeaux, France | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05227092