← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT05037370 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

CONTOURA vs WFO Ablation PRK & LASIK

Condition: Refractive Surgery  ·  Sponsor: 59th Medical Wing

PhaseNA
Planned participants400
Who can joinAll sexes, 21 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteersYes

About this study

This is a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes wave-front optimized (WFO) vs. wave-front guided (WFG) during Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to determine which ablation profile provides the best visual outcome.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

JOSE E CAPO-APONTE, OD, PhD  ·  210-292-2554  ·  Jose.E.CapoAponte.ctr@health.mil

AMBER MARTIN  ·  210-292-2483  ·  amber.l.martin38.ctr@health.mil

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Joint Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center at WHASCSan Antonio, Texas, United StatesRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05037370