● Recruiting

Comparison of Hemostatic Agent to Suture in Terms of Hemostatic Function and Preservation of Ovarian Function

Condition: Benign Ovarian Cyst · Sponsor: Seoul National University Hospital

PhaseNA

Planned participants90

Who can joinFemale, 19 Years to 45 Years

Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of preservation of ovarian function, hemostasis, and safety of a hemostatic agent versus suturing during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for ovarian endometriosis.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Hyunji Lim, MD · 82-2-2072-2821 · hyunji3292@gmail.com

Hee seung Kim, MD/PhD · 82-2-2072-4863 · bboddi0311@gmail.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (2)

Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital	Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea	Not Yet Recruiting
Seoul National University Hospital	Seoul, South Korea	Recruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04643106